That's me! Second from the right.
It's official, folks. Last Thursday, I had the priviledge of standing with Governor Jodi Rell as she signed "Safe Harbor for Exploited Children" into law. We worked closely with Sen. Rob Kane, ECPAT-USA, The Barnaba Institute, and CT Voices for Children throughout our whole campaign. Governor Rell stated in her press release, “Far too often, these youngsters are being exploited – they are runaways, substance abusers, even victims of human trafficking,” Governor Rell said. “They are not criminals. They are youths who need the full protection of our laws. At these young ages, any reasonable person knows they have been forced into a dangerous and despicable enterprise. Any amoral individual motivated by greed to exploit these children will be dealt with harshly.”
Driving up to Hartford with Christine Fantacone of ECPAT-USA, we discussed plans for the next states on the horizon-- New Jersey is a possibility for our next collaboration! I have already been in conversation with Oregonians Against the Trafficking of Humans (OATH) as they begin penning language for Safe Harbor in their state.
The newly signed Safe Harbor law, which will take effect on October 1, 2010, makes prostitution a criminal offense only for people age 16 and older. Furthermore, it calls for creating a presumption, one that must be rebutted by the prosecution, that 16- and 17-year olds alleged to have engaged in prostitution were coerced or enticed. Also, the new Safe Harbor law increases the penalty for promoting prostitution of persons younger than 18--boosting sanctions to as much as 20 years in prison and fines of $15,000! Finally, it specifies that a person is still guilty of 'patronizing a prostitute'(actual language from the law) regardless of the 'prostitute's' age/even if the victim cannot be prosecuted due to age.

help me understand
Submitted by LOVER OF PEOPLE (not verified) on Mon, 06/14/2010 - 5:25pm.
I am excited this is happening but i would like to know why the age is not 18? Why would anyone under the age of 18 be considered a criminal when it comes to selling the body? Obviously a 17 year old girl who is prostituting herself had bad advice somewhere along the way. The female brain is not fully developed til age 25 so i would like to see this law coincide with science of the brain so we can make sure the next state ups the age to 18. We need to come up with solutions to give these girls hope for a better life…as in becoming whatever they can dream of…doctors, lawyers, vets, brain surgeons, scientists, chefs, rock stars,,,whatever they want but NOT selling their body for cash…women need MORE OPTIONS…and higher pay…pay the ladies good at regular jobs. Thank you for amazing work…lets just put serious pressure on all the states to make it maximum penalties for pimping out our women…i do not want to see certain groups use this as their way to "legalize prostitution". We already have "legalized prostitution" it scalled internet porn…which is an entirely different fight,,,but our govt is being a hypocrite when it earns tax money from pornography…the U.S. govt is so guilting of pimping out women since the late 50's, this will be a tricky…but it needs to STOP. no government should earn one penny from pimping out people whether on the streets or online PERIOD. you know me!
Because the legal age of
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 06/14/2010 - 7:54pm.
Because the legal age of consent for sex is 16. If you cannot legally consent to have sex (i.e. you are under the age of 16) then it would stand you cannot be engaging in prostitution of your own accord.
Last Sentence
Submitted by David (not verified) on Mon, 06/14/2010 - 10:32pm.
Can you clarify that last sentence? Is it saying that the law can't be construed to protect underage pimps and johns, or is it saying something else entirely?
RE: last sentence
Submitted by Kathy Maskell on Tue, 06/15/2010 - 3:43pm.
Well, kind of. The last sentence of my post references a later amendment to the bill, which makes it explicit that a person is still guilty of 'patronizing a prostitute' regardless of the 'prostitute's' age/even if the victim cannot be prosecuted due to age. I've edited the post to make it more clear!
age of consent
Submitted by Kathy Maskell on Tue, 06/15/2010 - 3:47pm.
Yes, our original recommendations included raising the age to 18, but the law is written so it both takes into account the age of consent(16) in CT as well as creating the all-important presumption that a 16 or 17-yr old has been coerced or tricked into engaging in prostitution. This is a very important start in that we are at least beginning with eliminating any possibility of someone under 16 being charged with the crime of prostitution.
Curious
Submitted by Sex Trafficking (not verified) on Tue, 06/15/2010 - 4:14pm.
Just curious, what are the protection measures in CT for victims of trafficking who are older than 16/17? Are they just written off as prostitutes, or are they acknowledged as prostituted? Michelle
So incredibly happy this bill
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/27/2010 - 1:10am.
So incredibly happy this bill is signed. I can't wait for this to be in every state in our country, as it should be!
What is the practical effect?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/23/2010 - 3:05pm.
What is the practical effect? What happens to these children? who is responsible for ensuring they receive treatment for their sexual abuse? if they refuse to leave with parents, where do they go?
What are the practical
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/23/2010 - 5:12pm.
What are the practical effects of this legislation? What happens to these children and what system works with them to help them?
Post new comment